How May they use That Information?
페이지 정보
본문
Technological slavery
Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has modified the world eternally. Because of it, we will, for instance, send data to the opposite end of the world in seconds; speak to people from other continents; travel to any place in the world in sooner or later; store hundreds of pictures on a drive the dimensions of your thumb; create virtual realities, as well as do a bunch of other issues that nobody would have imagined simply one hundred years in the past.
But expertise has its bad aspect too. In the current world, it's controlled by organizations who would not have our greatest interests in thoughts. They won't hesitate to make use of expertise's nice power against us. Spying on - and analyzing - our communication; controlling the knowledge we receive; emotional manipulation; modification of behavior - those are just a few issues technology is getting used for today. All that with more protection, accuracy, effectiveness and with less human effort. If this "progress" is just not stopped, we will find yourself in a prison that we would not find in our worst nightmares.
I will try to explain the way the most important technologies of as we speak contribute to the creation of a global system of control. I may even point out just a few applied sciences of the longer term, and try to attach all the information together and predict the fate of this world. Let's begin with one of the innovations that have an effect on folks essentially the most - The Internet.
The Internet
Every connection, for instance sending a message, or entering a website, goes by means of your Internet Service Provider, before it reaches the goal. In idea this implies ISPs can freely spy on and modify every little thing you do on the web; for example - slow down or block the downloading of torrents; inject ads to your visited websites http://zmhenkel.blogspot.com/2013/03/isp-commercial-injection-cma.html (archive) (MozArchive), or even create a massive censorship system, just like the so-called "Great Wall" of China.
The commonest usage of the Internet is shopping web sites, for which we use a web browser resembling Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer or Google Chrome. These three "giants" pretty much exist to gather data on their customers. Google at least admits to it - however, Mozilla pretends to care about your freedom and privateness, but really spies on you and controls you. It has been a number of years since Mozilla decided they may resolve what add-ons you'll be able to and can't install - apparently to "protect the customers", but nothing stops them from, for example, disabling AdBlock. Mozilla has labored with advertisers for a long time - they've even shown them in your New Tab panel: https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2015/05/21/providing-a-helpful-platform-for-advertisers-content material-publishers-and-users/ (archive) (MozArchive). The parable of Firefox "respecting the user" has died and is not going to resurrect. Just learn a certain reply from their web site: Our products don't interrupt the looking expertise; they catch users when they are most receptive to seeing new info. So, for them, you might be merely prey to be caught for the purpose of getting commercials be shoved into your brain. Despite that, they still spew slogans about "respect and freedom". I might spend the entire article on stating all of the methods popular web browsers exploit you. Opera, for instance, actually spies in your complete net history with out your data. The three giants talked about earlier also spy on you, however in some other methods.
Almost every large webpage works closely with the police / government and can fortunately share knowledge about you with them - for instance, the IP address of the pc you made a discussion board submit from. Exceptions, such as Lavabit (interesting story by the best way - you'll be able to learn it on the web) or The Pirate Bay, have their servers raided.
Lately, it grew to become fashionable to retailer your data "within the cloud", for instance Dropbox or Google Drive. This is actually useful to the elites - they will now see and analyze your files, which can give them details about your interests or plans (which might be used against you). One man from 4chan was storing bomb making directions on Dropbox, only to find that, someday, they have been deleted. The Internet is filled with instances like that, and they're not all about bombs. Thus, we will see that your information is not secure on these cloud "providers" - it ceases being yours. Most certainly, in several years, wanting to keep your data by yourself drive will probably be thought-about "abnormal" - and cloud storage will be the usual - like it is as we speak with cash vs financial institution accounts, for example. This will open the door to complete control of your saved knowledge, mechanically blocking supplies about - for example - the aforementioned bombs. Another, maybe more plausible option, can be punishing the individuals who upload such information - like film producers did with individuals downloading sure torrents.
How do most individuals find info on the internet? Using Google, in fact. But Google is one thing greater than only a search engine - it is a company whose intention is gathering as much data as potential and creating a profile about you. Their spy scripts (for instance, google analytics) exist pretty much on every site - you possibly can even not know what Google is, however nonetheless be spied on. That data is then used to, for example, present you focused advertisements, but in addition totally different search outcomes. So a Christian searching for "abortion" will see something else than an atheist.
Google went further and invented a new algorithm for displaying search outcomes. The sites who are, in accordance with them, primarily based on "information" can be greater up. On the other hand, those who contain untrue info (once more, based on them) can be further down. One of many ways Google charges the truth value of sites is evaluating them with the articles on Wikipedia. And since we know the way Wikipedia treats conspiracy theories, we are able to assume they may pushed away by official versions of occasions. Soon, after we search for something like "genetically modified organisms" we will solely get "prepared" data. Google's invention might grow to be one among the simplest instruments of censorship and opinion control.
Google also controls other widespread companies. One in all the most well-liked is YouTube, which they've been "reforming" since they purchased it. I was shocked when a couple of years ago I could not log in to my YouTube account with out making a Gmail account. I did not need their e-mail (which spies on you) so I stated goodbye to YouTube. I didn't use it a lot, however nonetheless.
Another YouTube reform is named Content ID. It is supposed to protect copyright. The creator of a movie or tune can share their creation with Google, which is able to then compare it with each different file on YouTube. If it considers a type of recordsdata close sufficient to the submission, it'll both delete that file, remove sound from it, or add ads.
- Nintendo was able to put advertisements on some movies showcasing their games: http://www.destructoid.com/nintendo-is-claiming-possession-of-let-s-play-videos-253793.phtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A person uploaded some birds singing. Content ID assumed it was some copyright protected track, and added advertisements to it, which earned the creator of the nonexistent track money. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120227/00152917884/man-will get-bogus-youtube-copyright-claim-birds-singing-background.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- Some company even put commercials on another person's music, and earned cash from it: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150317/10513630347/umg-licenses-indie-artists-track-then-makes use of-content-id-to-declare-possession-it.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)
Before Content ID was invented, somebody who thought that a movie violates copyright, needed to ship YouTube a type, which could be accepted or not. These days though, they have a a lot simpler manner referred to as Content ID, which permits them to earn money if it finds some similarities. You'll be able to theoretically appeal a Content ID resolution, but it's pointless because the appeal will likely be decided by...the same firm that uploaded the file. Many frustrated individuals are complaining in internet feedback, saying that Content ID is terrible, that it made a mistake with their film, that they are stealing their money, that they've lost their recordsdata or their account. There've been debates about copyright and AI typically. Some people have mentioned that movie or music creators must be comfortable to have their content shared on YouTube. But these discussions can exist solely because Content ID occurred. Without it, people could freely share their films with out them being probably modified / deleted by automated evaluation.
An identical program could be used to delete motion pictures about undesirable matters. Even now YouTube is deleting "racist", "nationalist", "insulting" films - even when often that is just an excuse; but they must do it by hand. If they put together Content ID with the location sorting algorithm, they might create a system that deletes certain content routinely. A extra superior type of that algorithm could even delete sure components of motion pictures which have undesirable matters (for example, deleting a few second long half with a racist slur). It will work much like the profanity filters on forums. Nevertheless it wouldn't be limited solely to that - Google has proven, that they are very serious about controlling your beliefs, when they've created the site sorting algorithm I spoke about earlier. A instrument that would detect the place in your movie an undesirable topic is mentioned, and exchange it with their modified model, would be very welcome in their arsenal.
You possibly can write a complete e book about Google; I do not need to do it - however I have to briefly mention some other issues they've accomplished. Recaptcha is the most well-liked option to defend forums from spambots. When you wished to write down one thing on a forum with recaptcha, you needed to type a certain word. You didn't at all times get a phrase, although - you would get one thing like a avenue tackle, which might then get added to Google StreetView, which permits spying on individuals. For years, anybody who wrote on 4chan, was filling their database with avenue addresses, while not necessarily figuring out about that. What really is StreetView? Google automobiles travel the world taking footage of all the things and everybody. Then they put these images in their database, which can be searched by anyone. Google has entry to footage of the whole Earth, pretty much - and even to the history of locations folks seek for utilizing their maps. What may that data be used for? You can read on Wikipedia that plenty of international locations had a problem with StreetView. They thought it intrudes on the citizen's privacy. But after "consultations" they've all agreed to permit it. Isn't this proof that we're dealing with a worldwide plan to spy on folks?
They've changed ReCaptcha since I wrote the above. Now, you get a set of photos and you've got to decide on the ones containing a sure merchandise, for instance hamburgers. This is used to train Google's artificial intelligence, which may also in all probability be used against us in the future. I'll finish this section with a quote from Google We do not want you to type in any respect. We know where you might be. We all know the place you've got been. We are able to roughly know what you are desirous about.
Social networks
One of the most popular internet sites today are social networks, similar to Facebook or Twitter. People flock to them like flies, filling their databases with data resembling identify, surname, phone quantity, place of work, interests, and buddy lists. They do not have an issue with sharing their political opinions. Facebook makes it very easy, because the Like! button seems on most popular websites, and clicking it sends data to Facebook concerning the article you preferred. How might they use that info? For instance, for exhibiting targeted ads. A few years ago, Facebook promised that it will never do this - but then changed their thoughts and it's now a reality. A few of these ads may be insulting - for example, an individual suffering from cancer, after trying to find details about it on the internet, was shown advertisements about...burial providers! http://www.naturalnews.com/049386_Facebook_privateness_surveillance.html (archive) (MozArchive)
Comments written on these social networks are much more dangerous. They're connected to your actual name, and whoever finds your account can read them. What may very well be the consequences of that? You possibly can lose your job or be arrested. Some examples:
- An individual was arrested for posting lyrics of a heavy metallic tune on Twitter. The federal government thought he was literally threatening to kill folks and he was arrested. This incident was described in detail right here: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140906/13490628443/heavy-steel-lyrics-posted-to-facebook-outcome-arrest-terrorist-threats.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A waitress lost their job 48 hours after complaining on Facebook that she's incomes too little in suggestions. http://www.inc.com/news/articles/2010/05/waitress-fired-for-fb-publish.html (archive) (MozArchive)
We may very well be specializing in singular situations - was someone punished appropriately or not? You possibly can even blame the victim. But the logical factor to do is to look at the entire problem from afar. If these comments have been made in individual, and never on the web, no one might have gotten in hassle. The possibility of punishing somebody is the consequence of the know-how that attaches the belongings you post to your name. After years of utilizing social networks, you might discover one thing on anyone, even when he didn't think that the message he is writing would have given him issues later.
300 employers were requested whether they've checked the profiles of their would-be recruits, and 91% agreed. 69% dismissed an worker because of something he had in his profile. A few of the offending issues have been: unfavorable opinions about previous employers, photographs of utilizing medication or drinking alcohol, or "inappropriate" photos.
There are additionally extra direct ways in which the social networks can have an effect on you. In 2014 Facebook did a psychological experiment that was supposed to show which you could management human minds without figuring out them personally, and with out their information. 689003 people (who weren't aware of being lab rats) had been divided into two groups - one among them was proven solely content producing constructive feelings, the other - only destructive. The extra optimistic content material someone noticed, the extra positively he himself responded. The variations were small, however possibly they might be elevated with more drastic measures. For example, exhibiting somebody articles about murders or kidnappings. You can additionally target the content somebody was going to be shown individually - based mostly upon the things he's written in his profile, or his shopping history (which Facebook collects by means of the Like! buttons). If someone reads a lot of anti-government web sites, they could be shown articles about the government doing one thing unhealthy. Or an anti-GMO person can be shown information about GMOs being legalized someplace. It is plausible that this experiment opened the door to only this type of factor. You may learn the whole experiment here: http://www.pnas.org/content material/111/24/8788.full (archive) (MozArchive)
Facebook also makes use of an algorithm for detecting faces on images and mechanically including a reputation to them. http://www.dailydot.com/technology/fb-deepface-science/ (archive) (MozArchive). In case your title is on not less than one photograph, every other picture together with your face could possibly be detected as you.
Communication and encryption
Increasingly more human communication is finished electronically. This has the identical downside as bank accounts - you pay for a basic human need. But that is not an important. A human speaking eye to eye is spontaneous. He knows only the particular person he's speaking to can hear him. Then he brings that angle in direction of talking within the phone, which follows different rules - all information about when, where, and to whom you made the decision is stored within the provider's database. In most international locations the police has entry to the information if they have the court docket order. But in Great Britain - the leader of electronic spying - three of 4 most used providers send all their data to police in real time: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/10/computerized-police-entry-prospects-cellular-cellphone-data-like-money-machine-ripa-three-ee-vodafone/ (archive) (MozArchive). The implications are enormous - the identical group (the police) who can fantastic or punish you, now has access to all your cellphone calls. People have been locked up for SMS messages earlier than, but normally they had to physically search their telephones. This requirement disappears with the automated system of sending messages to police.
The identical is true of internet communication. Most people use widespread tools like Gmail or Skype. In one of his leaked documents, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA (National Security of America) has a program called PRISM, with which those corporations cooperate. Since 2011, Skype provides access to your conversations to the NSA, together with video recording:
Of course, we could use less in style software with an encryption capability, but would that protect us from spying?
David Cameron, the prime minister of Great Britain, got here up with an concept to ban encryption, arguing that There ought to be no technique of communication, which we cannot read. Many individuals laughed, saying that the federal government must delete encryption software program from folks's laborious drives (and would that really be a problem for them? Malware exists, you know). Others thought that they cannot implement it, as a result of it would make banking and such insecure. But this looks more like a desperate technique to dismiss the chance that, in the close to future, all our conversations completed electronically will likely be spied on by the federal government.
In another leak of NSA's documents, it was shown that they want to reduce the effectiveness of common encryption:
You don't need to work with a software program's creator to spy on our conversations, although. Even in open supply software program (that anyone with sufficient data and dedication can examine), there nonetheless occur bugs that can weaken the encryption. For example, OpenSSL, the most popular library encrypting our communications with websites, for 1.5 years had a bug permitting to obtain a small amount of information from the memory of the server that it is used on, and that data might embody passwords and encryption keys. NSA, in fact, took benefit of that: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-11/nsa-stated-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-customers (archive) (MozArchive) Another example: Cryptocat screwed up the implementation of an encryption algorithm, which allowed anybody with enough capability to decrypt communication made with it. And NSA has these capabilities - in addition they save all encrypted communications, to allow them to decrypt it later.
And they will almost certainly succeed - there is a big likelihood that quantum computers will make all current ciphers irrelevant - https://hackaday.com/2015/09/29/quantum-computing-kills-encryption/ (archive) (MozArchive) - so private conversations can be a factor of the previous. Add to that voice recognition software, and we're finding ourselves in a world where all our conversations are looked for sure phrases (by a program similar to Content ID I've talked about earlier).
Electronic banking
Cash payments are increasingly more typically being replaced by electronic ones. People just like the comfort of with the ability to order anything they want and pay for it with a number of clicks. Having a bank account is something regular lately, even required. But behind the curtain hide gigantic implications for human privacy and freedom.
Let's start from the fundamentals - what is electronic cash? It is a number in a database on a server belonging to the bank you're using. Your capability to purchase something relies on how big that quantity is - and since people should, for example, eat - your life depends on it. How much electronic money you may have is dependent on lots of stuff you cannot affect - simply utilizing a checking account costs cash, so taking part on this system means you automatically lose it.
A bank can eat rather more of your cash - even without bearing in mind hacking assaults like this: https://thehackernews.com/2016/05/swift-banking-hack.html (archive) (MozArchive), where the hackers stole 12 million dollars. One guy from Cyprus got 720 000 Euros stolen by the european fee to repay Cyprus' debt. He had to hearth all his Cypriot employees and move to another country. First, the sum was displayed as "blocked", then they deleted it altogether from his account. And, as he himself says, Thousands of other firms round Cyprus have the identical scenario. This reveals how a lot you possibly can rely on a number in a database - all it takes is one thought in someone's mind, and it is gone. Read extra about this matter here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?matter=160292 (archive) (MozArchive)
Another drawback with electronic payments is the truth that they are anti-privacy. All your transactions are saved within the bank's database. And the people controlling the bank can use it against you - blocking unwanted transactions, resembling buying bitcoins http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ (archive) (MozArchive) or donations to WikiLeaks: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit-playing cards/naughty-issues-credit-card-wont-buy-6.aspx (archive) (MozArchive). It is simple to think about a world where all your transactions are analyzed and routinely blocked based on a listing of banned objects.
Paper cash does not have that drawback. It is not going to disappear from your pocket. There is no such thing as a central level that shops details about your transactions. You can't "flip someone off" if he pays with paper cash - if somebody doesn't wish to promote you one thing, you go someplace else. Paper cash is a software of the free individual - that's why the elites are targeting it.
But you'll be able to still use paper cash, right? Maybe not for long - they've been making an attempt to get individuals used to electronic payments for a very long time. Advertising financial institution accounts is commonplace. Increasingly more employers require having a bank account. The limits on the amount you may spend at once with paper cash are going down worldwide:
Will they go down to zero? In some locations that's already the case; for instance, buses in London cannot be paid for in money since 3 years ago. The quantity of cashless locations will increase, and folks will probably be tied up in the electronic net of slavery.
2017 replace: since writing the above, the situation has acquired a lot worse. In Sweden, funds are nearly absolutely electronic: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/04/sweden-cashless-society-playing cards-telephone-apps-main-europe (archive) (MozArchive) - Swedish buses have not taken money for years, it's not possible to buy a ticket on the Stockholm metro with cash, retailers are legally entitled to refuse coins and notes, and avenue distributors - and even churches - more and more want card or cellphone payments.
In November 8 of 2016, the prime minister of India has eradicated the 2 largest notes, which elevated the quantity of debit card funds by 108%. In the radio he stated Less-cash first, cashless society next. There are many different examples in different countries, such as Denmark, the USA, etc. There's little doubt we're coping with a worldwide plan to destroy cash.
CCTV cameras
The strongest weapon of the technological management system are positively the CCTV cameras. While you'll be able to mostly keep away from all the opposite things (no less than for now), the cameras are doing their job just by current. They had been slowly being put into varied locations - from retailers and faculties to the streets, buses and flats; you'll be able to assume that wherever you progress, your life is being stored, watched and analyzed by strangers. I've identified a spot the place some drunks appreciated to satisfy up and so they put a digital camera in there, which the drunks destroyed. But the next day they replaced it again, so it's clearly very important to them.
The existence of the spying system completely adjustments the relations between individuals and the elites. You can't really feel snug figuring out that your every move is being spied on (by individuals who may punish you in the event you do something they deem "flawed"). Most people do not seem to care though - they purchase in shops loaded with cameras and send their kids to colleges that have cameras. Some are even joyful that they are being watched, repeating dumb slogans about "security", or other excuses that don't have anything to do with reality. But this is just the beginning - the effectiveness of the spying system will improve so much that you will not have the ability to stay the best way you at all times have. So what's the next part of this system?
Advanced cameras can do far more than just recording video and counting on the human's interpretation. They will spy on a human as he goes from one digital camera's range to another's, detect faces, mark people based on gender or other standards:
They also can detect your habits and mark it as doubtlessly "suspicious". That is already being used in locations like India https://www.nice.com/defending/press-releases/Nanded-India-Deploys-Nice-Safe-City-Solution-to-Protect-Citizens-Visitors-and-Historical-Sites-129 (archive) (MozArchive), Glasgow https://www.nice.com/protecting/press-releases/Nice-Safe-City-Solutions-Deployed-in-Glasgow-to-Bolster-Security-Safety-and-Operations-Management-137 (archive) (MozArchive), and even within the Polish city Katowice http://katowice.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/katowicki-inteligentny-system-monitoringu-i-analizy-czyli,2656606,artgal,t,id,tm.html (archive) (MozArchive)
This system makes absolute slaves out of people. There's a central point wherein the police can analyze all the info. One of many "suspicious behaviors" that were being advertised by the CCTV firms was taking out a pistol out of your pocket. But something in any respect will be considered "suspicious". Let's take a look at a few of the common things that I've seen being banned: selling stuff on the streets, feeding birds, wearing a mask, walking the dog (!), driving without seat belts, and so on. Sometimes people get fined for these items, but they have to be came upon first. The clever monitoring system removes this requirement, letting the psychopathic elites superb anyone for something they think about.
Imagine you are strolling through an alley that's loaded with these cameras whereas eating a sandwich. Then you definitely throw away the bag during which the sandwich was. A digicam sees that and assigns you a tremendous of 50 dollars for littering. Your face has been detected and the path you are taking is now being watched and sent to the police in actual time. A couple of minutes later the police comes; you are attempting to cover however it's not possible, since there are cameras everywhere, and so they know your place. In the long run, you pay up, the same as anybody who has ever littered. This will look humorous now, but the know-how exists to make this scenario a actuality, it's only a matter of implementing it. The ads for these cameras make it clear - being in the crowd will not protect you. Neither will hiding your face, altering clothes, shifting someplace, and so forth. People will for positive try to discover a approach to fool this system, and they could even succeed at the start - but the algorithms will get better, and can finally make it not possible to fool them.
Inventions of the long run
There are other applied sciences, which have been lately invented, that sooner or later will gas the control system. Pretty much every new invention has the potential to do that (or even is invented because of this), but I will strive to describe an important ones.
Microchips
There's a large campaign all over the world to put chips in people's pets, allegedly to "be able to find them", however truly the purpose is to get people used to the idea of chipping. And then they'll chip the people. In some bars or workplaces they're already getting used to, for example, open doorways; after enough propaganda they will be injected in every youngster that is born. They will change ID cards, credit score playing cards, and other current documents. They are going to be required in more and more places, and you will not be capable to fulfill fundamental wants (comparable to buying) with out them. Why do the elites need to chip the people so unhealthy? Because it would permit them to create a gigantic database containing the time and place of each person. This has already been tried in some American schools, for instance: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/youngsters-tagged-rfid-chips-creepy-new-expertise-colleges-use-monitor-all the things-youngsters-do (archive) (MozArchive). The youngsters put on ID playing cards on their necks, and people cards have the chips in them. Their position is being sent to the varsity computers in real time, as well as detecting events reminiscent of entering or leaving college, shopping for lunch, or coming into the library. It's only a matter of time till we all have them below our skins.
Holograms
Advertisements have been with us for a very long time, even earlier than expertise. You'll be able to keep away from them by installing AdBlock or switching to a different Tv channel. But you won't be in a position to hide from an advertisement displayed, for example, on grass or the sky. I thought that is far into the future earlier than I wrote this text, but actually, this has already been tried: https://thefutureofthings.com/5069-nike-launched-a-holographic-3d-advertising-marketing campaign/ (archive) (MozArchive) This is also used not solely to promote merchandise, but convince individuals of the fact of a sure model of occasions.
Self-driving automobiles
Already being tested in, for example, California https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-01/tesla-is-testing-self-driving-vehicles-on-california-roads (archive) (MozArchive). And when they may lastly be put into roads, we are going to keep listening to about how protected they're (this already happens, however might be much more widespread). When individuals lastly get satisfied of the safety of those automobiles, regular cars can be banned since they are allegedly much less secure than the computer-controlled ones. So we are going to be able to drive solely based on the trail the computer chooses, which can after all even be saved in the worldwide database. Cars and not using a steering wheel (already exist) may also stop fleeing from the police.
Culmination of the technological management system
The final purpose of the technological management system is putting together all these instruments to allow full control of humanity. To make use of the Internet, you will have to provide your real identify (or possibly flash a microchip?) - so All we do there will be connected to our real person. All encrypted connections and conversations will likely be decrypted on the fly and analyzed. Freely downloading torrents and even making jokes like "die in a fireplace" can be a thing of the previous. All the knowledge you obtain will likely be managed - just like what Facebook and Google already do, but globally.
Our bodily position shall be tracked by cameras and microchip scanners which will probably be in locations corresponding to outlets, airports, flats, and many others. So our movements shall be analyzed in real time - however not by folks, like it's now, but by AI (or even robots, farther sooner or later). You will not have the ability to flee from this system - they'll even spy on the homeless (there have been already applications to seek out and catalogue the homeless' place, allegedly to assist them, but it surely actually was in regards to the spying). Maybe they will soon put cameras of their favorite locations, if they don't seem to be already doing that. December 17 revision: heh, they're already doing that - https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/13/security-robots-are-being-used-to-ward-off-san-franciscos-homeless-population/ (archive) (MozArchive). Didn't suppose it will get there so fast!
Paper cash will absolutely disappear. All our transactions might be related to our real name, as every part else. There might be a giant, worldwide database storing the physical position of each person, in addition to every thing he has ever carried out, said, wrote, bought...All his movements will, in fact, be analyzed in actual time by AI. I believe the expertise for all that already exists - so it is a social or logistical problem, not a technological one. How lengthy will it take the elites to install all that, and get people used to slavery? I don't know. But one factor is for sure: the comfy life that you're used to, might be only a cheerful reminiscence soon.
Update 2022: somehow I felt like updating this, since I think I didn't make my most important level as effectively as I needed to. So, imagine a video game character, like Mario. By interacting with the sport, we will verify how high he can soar, how long does it take him to succeed in full running pace, what kinds of enemies he can stomp on and which he can't, and so forth. Since Mario is only a program working on our computer systems / consoles, we can study all that he can do at any moment. His bounce peak is a relentless, so we will theoretically calculate whether or not he can hit some block, or in how a lot time (in-game frames) a certain enemy will attain us. More than that - by knowing the particulars of the game, we are able to resolve what's the most effective course of action 5 ranges down the street.
This is, in fact, how extremely precise speedruns are created. For easy video games like Super Mario Bros, they are already very optimized, virtually all the way down to a single step. But the identical rules apply to even complicated video games like JRPGs. Picking up a sure merchandise early on can mean you can do one thing 2 hours later. Learning a sure talent that is weak at first can help you kill the ultimate boss in a single hit. Running from a battle can set a RNG-dependent variable to a certain optimal worth, and so on. To an everyday participant, these methods may appear silly within the brief time period, but they finalize in the best possible route ultimately. It isn't nearly speedruns, however any form of problem runs, and so forth. would require deep data and long run evaluation of the sport mechanics to perform.
Now what if I instructed you that reality is the video recreation in question? Imagine - your location is already identified by your smartphone, or automobile, or an online of CCTV, or a combination of these. Your deepest darkest desires are recognized by your search engines like google, your network of pals by the social media services, and so on. Just this alone allows huge information, prediction and control skills (this has been described within the previous sections). But think about we go deeper with microchips, thought readers, sensible cities and stuff like that. With rising know-how, we grow to be extra like the video sport character.
To achieve that level, we require three things. First is the technology that allows us exact enough data collection. Second is highly effective computer systems that enable calculations quick enough to predict outputs primarily based on inputs long ahead in time (what chess engines already do, however in a way more complicated system). The third is the technology that enables us to push switches - the best way a keyboard or joystick does in a video game device. See, we're nonetheless physical beings, dependent on things like genes expressing themselves, neurons firing, hormones entering a cell to trigger certain changes, and many others. All of this might be theoretically managed by technology. Even now, with the relatively easy switches that we've, we will already trigger depression in social media customers by displaying them sure stories. We will get individuals to purchase issues due to AI-determined direct commercials, and so forth. Imagine if we get down to the extent of the cell!
And the elites are surely working on such a expertise as we converse. I mean, what do you suppose the mRNA vaccines are? Now I guess some of this could be used positively, but it surely by some means never is in the present world, so it is a idiot's dream. The principle level is, we are going to lose our humanity both way, when the analysis and management capability reaches Mario's stage. We should either decide to inhibit such a technology, or give up our humanity, since e.g mendacity won't be doable with neuron entry. Hey, maybe you think that people will resolve to surrender superior technology. Forget about it, Ted Kaczynski has long disproved such a notion - know-how develops pretty much by itself, without regard to human hopes and goals.
And because of this we want the bodily infrastructure soon. If the world is managed by evil actors (because it is true now) and they've all this functionality (which we don't), including direct cell entry, God help us. The upper the know-how, the bigger the ability difference between us and the elites. Resistance is not going to be attainable anymore when know-how reaches such a stage (which I might guess takes no more than a few many years). Imagine them being in a position to point out a graph of your most definitely movements based on the knowledge they already have, in real time, and use it in opposition to you. How are you able to resist, when the computers can predict what you are going to do on Level 6 of the fact recreation - and push a change to deny or change it? You will never do anything apart from what the elites (or the AI, whether it is given management and goes rogue) permit. And because the technological development won't cease, we need to take over proper now.
To find more info about xfans.tube visit the internet site.
- 이전글dostavka-oae.ru 24.01.10
- 다음글Trending free Porn Videos 24.01.10
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.